200 Rounds of 9mm Ammo by Federal Personal Defense - 147gr HST JHP

6 Ready to Ship

$289.00

Ammo Overview

Ammo Quantity - 200 rounds per case; 20 rounds per box
Ammo Manufacturer - Federal
Projectiles - 147 grain jacketed hollow point (JHP)
Ammo Casings - Boxer-primed nickel-plated brass

Details

This 9mm cartridge from Federal’s Personal Defense line of ammunition features the American manufacturer’s HST projectile. The bullet’s hollow cavity is designed in such a way as to prevent itself from jamming up with media before it can unleash its deadly expansion within a soft target. During expansion this bullet’s core and jacket peel pack to produce six deadly cutting petals, but without losing the weight they need to guarantee deep penetration. Not too deep, however -- an HST burrows to the perfect depth within a threat in order to incapacitate it, without overpentrating and putting innocents at risk.

This round’s casing is made of brass, and is reloadable. Furthermore, it’s plated in nickel to enhance its lubricity for smooth feeding and ejection in a semi-automatic, let it avoid corroding when it comes into contact with moisture and humidity, and make it more visible during a spontaneous chamber check. This round also owes its superior reliability to its bullet’s nose profile, which is engineered to promote seamless feeding.

Write Your Own Review

You're reviewing: 200 Rounds of 9mm Ammo by Federal Personal Defense - 147gr HST JHP

How do you rate this product? *

Performance
Bargain?
Reliable?

Our customer service team has published this Q&A information as a free service to the shooting community. Please note that BulkAmmo.com expressly disclaims any and all liability with regard to how the shooting community might use this Q&A information. See Terms of Use for more details.

Posted On: 9/15/2019 By: Chrtian Garcia

A: Hi Chris! This Federal HST Jacketed Hollow Point (JHP) round would be a great choice for use as a self-defense round in a Glock 19. For the range and practice, Full Metal Jacket (FMJ) rounds would be a more economical choice.

Post your question
  • Please enter your name as you want it to appear on our site.
    Please tell us where you want the answer sent (it will not appear on our site).

* Required Fields